Editorial Policy

This page explains how Nooklance decides what to publish, how articles are researched and checked, and what happens when we get something wrong.

Who we write for

Our readers are freelancers, solopreneurs and very small teams. Each article is written around a concrete problem such as choosing a tool, structuring a week or handling a difficult client situation, and aims to help the reader decide what to do, not just to list options.

How articles are researched

• Descriptions of tools and features are checked against the providers' own websites and documentation.
• We avoid unverifiable claims, such as invented statistics, and describe outcomes as general experience rather than guarantees.
• We say when a recommendation depends on your situation, and we name the trade-offs.
• Where we discuss research, such as the effect of task switching on focus, we describe it in general terms and do not overstate what it shows.

Use of AI in our process

We may use AI-based tools to help with research, outlining and drafting. Articles are reviewed and edited by a person before publication, and responsibility for what appears on the site rests with the Nooklance editorial team, not with any tool.

Independence from advertisers and affiliates

Advertising and affiliate commissions help fund the site, but they do not decide what we cover or what we say about it. Sponsors and advertisers do not review or approve our articles. See our disclaimer for details on ads and affiliate links.

Keeping articles up to date

Software changes quickly. We review articles that discuss specific tools or pricing and update them when details change. Articles show when they were last updated.

Corrections

If you believe something on Nooklance is inaccurate, email hello@nooklance.com with the article title and the passage in question. We review each report, fix confirmed errors promptly, and update the article's date when a substantive change is made.